Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -84

The statement involves a critical discussion on U.S. foreign policy, specifically regarding the provision of military aid to Israel and its implications for actions in Rafah. This topic is a significant aspect of public discourse as it involves international relations, military ethics, and governmental transparency.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm due to military actions, which is relevant but could be seen as speculative without solid evidence of the claims. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by not targeting any individuals with derogatory comments but discusses the actions of public figures in their professional capacities. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting a potential discrepancy in public statements versus actions, which could foster a more informed public. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of criticism that could encourage dialogue about the consistency and ethics of foreign policy decisions. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement could benefit from more precise sourcing or evidence to strengthen its credibility and avoid spreading potential misinformation. [-1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to question and scrutinize government actions, which is a fundamental aspect of democratic societies. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by contributing to a debate on a matter of public interest without resorting to misinformation or harmful rhetoric. [+1]