In reply to:
Yule 🐭
@YuleHeibel
·
428d
Walter Kirn
@walterkirn
·
428d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of a proposed law, Bill C-63, concerning online speech and its retroactive regulation. The user expresses concern about the potential for this law to punish past speech, which they view as problematic. This discussion touches upon issues of free speech, legal retroactivity, and governmental policy, which are significant in the context of civic dialogue.
- The statement aims to highlight concerns about the fairness and implications of retroactively punishing speech, which could be seen as an attempt to prevent potential harm that such policies might cause. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The user respects the dignity of others by focusing on the policy's impact rather than attacking individuals who might support it. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The comment contributes to a broader understanding of the proposed law's implications, fostering a more informed public. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the potential consequences of Bill C-63, the user uses their platform to inform and engage others on important legislative changes, potentially benefiting society by promoting awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The user responsibly uses their platform to discuss public policy, contributing to the public discourse in a constructive manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.