Mike Johnson

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 5

The statement discusses the influence of illegal immigrants on U.S. elections and supports legislation that ensures only American citizens are counted in the census for electoral apportionment. It touches on issues of immigration, electoral integrity, and representation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may indirectly cause harm by promoting a divisive narrative about illegal immigrants. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of American citizens in terms of electoral representation but could be seen as disrespectful towards immigrants by discussing them primarily in a negative context. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a tone of empathy and compassion towards immigrants, focusing instead on legislative actions against them. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the statement engages in a form of dialogue about immigration policy, it does so in a manner that might not encourage constructive criticism or understanding.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge the complex reasons behind immigration or the potential contributions of immigrants to society. [-1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to promote a specific legislative agenda, which is a legitimate use of platform, but it could be seen as promoting divisiveness.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing an opinion on public policy, though the manner in which it does so could be contentious. [+1]