Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on RFK Jr's refusal to debate Jill Stein, attributing his refusal to fear of defending his position on Palestine and concern about losing support among young voters. The statement implies that RFK Jr's public persona as a candidate for justice and peace is not genuine.
- The statement potentially does harm by accusing RFK Jr of supporting genocide, which is a very strong and damaging claim that could affect his reputation and public perception. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of RFK Jr, as it accuses him of supporting genocide without substantiation and portrays him in a negative light. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and inflammatory language that could incite division rather than foster understanding. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of personal attack by questioning RFK Jr's integrity and motives rather than focusing solely on his policies or actions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society but rather seems aimed at discrediting an individual in a manner that could polarize and detract from constructive public discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.