The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of Canada's Online Harms Act, suggesting that it contains 'futuristic horrors' and that there has been an effort by politicians and media to obscure its more controversial aspects. The tone is critical and aims to provoke thought and awareness about potential issues within the legislation.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to inform and warn readers about potential harms, thus aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It respects the dignity of others by not targeting any specific individuals but rather addressing the legislation and its coverage.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The critical nature of the statement promotes understanding and potentially compassion for those who might be affected by the legislation.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.It engages in constructive criticism of the legislation, inviting dialogue on its contents and the manner in which it has been presented to the public.
[+1]Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.The statement acknowledges the complexity of the issue by noting that only 'a few notable exceptions' have not kept the worst parts hidden, suggesting a nuanced view of the media landscape.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.By raising awareness and prompting discussion, the statement uses its influence for the societal good, encouraging a more informed public.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using its platform to discuss and critique government policy responsibly.
[+1]