In reply to:
urhotneighbours
@willametteshark
·
444d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
444d
The statement '@willametteshark There’s a huge difference between screaming some shit at Yale or Columbia and actually being a member of Hamas.' is part of a broader discussion on the implications of the No Fly List and its potential conflicts with First Amendment rights. The statement attempts to differentiate between verbal expressions at educational institutions and formal allegiance to a designated terrorist organization, suggesting a nuanced approach to how expressions and affiliations should be treated in the context of national security.
- The statement does not cause harm but rather contributes to a discussion on civil liberties and security. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of others by not making personal attacks, focusing instead on the distinction between speech and formal terrorist affiliations. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The comment promotes understanding by highlighting the complexity of handling expressions of speech versus actual terrorist affiliations in security protocols. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in a form of constructive criticism of broad policies without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is a response in a chain of public discourse, acknowledging the complexity of the issue rather than oversimplifying it. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- It uses the platform to discuss important societal issues regarding security and freedom of speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds principles of free speech by implicitly criticizing policies that might overly restrict it based on non-violent expressions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.