Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement 'That’s why I’m voting for Jill Stein and not Genocide Joe' is a part of public discourse as it engages in political commentary and expresses a voting preference based on perceived political actions or policies. The statement uses a derogatory nickname for a political figure, which can be seen as inflammatory.
- The statement potentially does harm by using derogatory language ('Genocide Joe'), which could incite hostility and reduce the quality of political discourse. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it refers to, using a term that is harsh and could be considered defamatory. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or compassion. Instead, it uses divisive language that could polarize opinions further. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The use of derogatory nicknames in political discourse does not contribute positively to society or encourage a responsible use of influence. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.