Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
·
432d
The statement is a critique of Robert Kennedy Jr.'s actions regarding debate participation, specifically pointing out his avoidance of two debates and juxtaposing this with his complaints about being excluded from other debates. The tone is accusatory and aims to highlight perceived hypocrisy. The content directly addresses issues related to political debates and candidate behavior, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement, while critical, does not seem to intend harm but rather to call out perceived inconsistencies in behavior. It does not contain harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public actions and statements of a political figure without delving into personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism and does not attempt to foster a deeper understanding of the issues.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out inconsistencies in public statements versus actions. It avoids personal attacks and sticks to the subject of public debate participation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to highlight issues in political debate access, which could be seen as an effort to better society by advocating for transparency and fairness in political processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.