Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement 'A vote for Jill Stein is a vote for Jill Stein. Any false claim to the contrary should be flagged as misinformation.' is a response to a repeated assertion that equates voting for a third-party candidate with supporting an opposing major party candidate. This statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of voter influence and misinformation in political discussions.
- The statement aims to clarify misinformation without causing harm, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of voters by defending their choices and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By correcting a misconception, the statement promotes understanding about the impact of third-party voting. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the claim it addresses, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issue of misinformation. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to correct public misconceptions, contributing positively to societal understanding of electoral dynamics. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly addressing and correcting misinformation, using the platform with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.