Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 94
5/17/2024, 4:24:51 PM
X
In reply to:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
415d
This is where the GOP chaos matters.

AFTER the Republican Chair and GOP members broke official House protocol to allow MTG’s horrific opening silo of rhetoric, they THEN made another change to dispense with the legislative process.

THAT part is not getting enough attention.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
415d
Remember: the hearing was about contempt proceedings - otherwise known as a “markup hearing,” where the full committee must vote at the end.

In markups, both parties offer amendments. This is standard. Amendments are voted on and then the full proposal.

Dems had 7 amendments.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
415d
Here’s the problem with “both sidesing” the chaos that was the Republican Oversight hearing.

Republicans VOTED in cmte to allow the rhetoric that was used against Ms. Crockett last night.

Notice that when Dems have the majority, these things don’t happen.

It also gets worse…
Reese Gorman
@reesejgorman
·
415d
Speaker Johnson on the chaos that went down at the Oversight markup last night:

“It's not a good look for Congress. And as I've said a few times this morning, decorum is an important principle to maintain. And we're going to continue to try to advance that principle and we…

The statement in question is a part of a public discourse as it engages substantively with a public issue, specifically the conduct and procedural norms of legislative processes in a governmental setting. The statement critiques the actions taken during a legislative session, which is a matter of public concern and contributes to civic dialogue about governmental transparency and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potentially harmful actions in legislative processes without causing harm itself. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on procedural actions rather than personal attributes. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the legislative process and the importance of standard procedures, fostering a sense of accountability. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the legislative process without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight issues of governance and procedural integrity, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss public procedural concerns with integrity. [+1]