Margaret Kimberley
@freedomrideblog
·
421d
The statement is a call to action for Morehouse students to protest against a speaker, referred to as 'Genocide Joe', at their graduation ceremony. It frames the protest as a continuation of Martin Luther King Jr.'s mission and criticizes the speaker as a major purveyor of violence. The tone is confrontational and strongly opinionated, aiming to mobilize and persuade students to demonstrate their disapproval during the graduation event.
- The statement potentially does harm by using inflammatory language ('Genocide Joe') which could incite hostility rather than foster a peaceful protest. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement disrespects the dignity of the individual being protested (referred to as 'Genocide Joe'), which could be seen as a form of verbal harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it encourages division and confrontation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a personal attack ('Genocide Joe') rather than providing constructive criticism or fostering dialogue about the disagreements with the individual's policies or actions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement aims to use influence for what it perceives as societal betterment, the approach taken (name-calling, encouraging protest) may not effectively achieve positive societal change.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.