Christopher C. Cuomo

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 51

The statement in question is part of a heated exchange on social media involving accusations and defenses regarding journalistic integrity and political bias. The tone is confrontational and defensive, focusing on denying allegations of collusion with Michael Cohen and producing biased stories about Donald Trump. The content directly addresses issues of media ethics and political partisanship, which are relevant to public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially harms reputations by labeling individuals as liars, which could escalate conflicts rather than resolve them. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy to some extent by not divulging new personal information, but it attacks the dignity of others by using derogatory language ('Guy is a liar'). [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and compassion, focusing instead on aggressive denial and counter-accusation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does so in a manner that may not be constructive due to its confrontational tone. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes or misinformation, instead it focuses solely on denial.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of aggressive language and unsubstantiated accusations may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to defend oneself but does so in a way that may not uphold the integrity expected in public discourse. [-1]