The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), and expresses a critical opinion on its increasing acceptance. The tone is critical and somewhat alarmist, suggesting that the theory is 'terrifying' now that it is being taken seriously.
- The statement does not appear to do harm directly, but the use of the word 'terrifying' could be seen as inflammatory, which might indirectly cause harm by inciting fear or panic. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical without providing a balanced view or fostering constructive dialogue. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either. It is more dismissive than engaging. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a critical opinion. However, the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the alarmist tone. Minor alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.