Shannon Butler
@ShannonJulia13
·
186d
The statement in question is part of a Twitter conversation about the credibility and behavior of journalists in relation to political reporting. It specifically addresses the issue of media integrity and bias, which are relevant topics in public discourse. The statement criticizes the selective belief in a public figure's statements, suggesting a lack of consistency and potential bias in media reporting. This engages with public issues of media trustworthiness and the role of journalists in shaping political perceptions.
- The statement uses harsh language ('disappointing', 'lying liar') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to a degree but uses strong language that borders on personal attack, which could be seen as a minor violation of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is accusatory and divisive, focusing on criticizing behavior without fostering any positive discourse. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that includes personal attacks ('lying liar') rather than purely constructive criticism. This does not foster a healthy dialogue or debate. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.