The statement appears to be a response to a public issue involving the decision of a local DA's office not to prosecute a public figure, Diddy, for allegedly attacking Cassie Ventura. The tone is factual and seems to clarify the legal reasoning behind the decision, specifically mentioning the statute of limitations and the lack of prosecutorial choice.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual clarification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide a factual clarification which can contribute to a more informed public.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the legal reasoning behind the decision. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing factual information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.