Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement comments on the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its impact on Israeli and Palestinian relations, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue. The tone is somewhat sarcastic, highlighting the rare unity between Israelis and Palestinians in their opposition to the ICC's actions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive of the serious nature of the conflict. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It uses sarcasm, which may not foster constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions of the ICC and the reactions of the involved parties. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to comment on a significant public issue. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.