Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement expresses gratitude for receiving an award and uses the opportunity to address a public issue related to free speech and government actions during public health crises. The tone is assertive and critical of government censorship, framing it as a violation of civil rights.
- The statement aims to highlight an issue of public concern, potentially raising awareness about perceived government overreach. However, it could be seen as divisive, which might not fully align with the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not targeting specific individuals but criticizes government actions broadly. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for those who feel censored, aligning with the principle of using words to promote compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By addressing a significant public issue, the statement uses the speaker's influence to contribute to societal discourse, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by advocating against censorship, aligning with the responsible use of a platform to discuss civil rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.