The statement addresses a public issue, specifically U.S. border security and immigration policies under different presidential administrations. It presents a comparison between the policies of President Trump and President Biden, suggesting a deterioration in border security under the latter. The statement also includes a link to an article that provides anecdotal evidence supporting the claim.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses charged language such as 'wide open' and 'millions of illegals,' which can be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement refers to migrants as 'illegals,' which is a dehumanizing term and does not respect the dignity of others. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards migrants. Instead, it frames them in a negative light, which violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad, negative assertion without engaging with opposing viewpoints or providing a nuanced analysis. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue.
[-2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible and lacking integrity, given the use of inflammatory language and dehumanizing terms. This partially violates the principle of upholding free speech responsibly and with integrity.
[-1]