Matt Taibbi

The statement 'Because the president has absolute power to do so? Same reason Marc Rich got one' is a response to a question about why Paul Manafort received a pardon. This statement engages in public discourse as it addresses the use of presidential pardons, a significant public issue. The tone is somewhat dismissive and implies a critique of the presidential pardon process.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the complexities of the pardon process.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the privacy and dignity of those involved.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on making a point about presidential power. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a rhetorical question that implies a critique without offering a detailed argument or solution. [-1]