Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a significant public issue concerning the distribution of humanitarian aid in Gaza and the involvement of the U.S. military and administration. It also includes a hashtag that labels Hamas as evil, which adds a layer of opinion to the factual report.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but the hashtag #HamasIsEvil could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful in a sensitive geopolitical context. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the hashtag could be seen as disrespectful to some. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, especially with the use of the hashtag. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and includes a personal attack on Hamas. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an important issue but does so in a way that could be seen as divisive. (0 points)Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could be more responsible in its language. (0 points)Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.