Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a journalist following up on a public policy issue, specifically student loan debt forgiveness. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant societal issue and seeks to clarify or question aspects of a public policy decision.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a straightforward question seeking clarification on a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification on a public policy issue, which can help the public better understand the policy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking a question without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by addressing a public policy issue in a respectful manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.