The statement discusses the significance of polling results in the context of qualifying for a CNN debate, referencing specific poll data and expressing concern over the acceptance criteria used by CNN. The tone is assertive and aims to highlight perceived discrepancies in the polling data considered by CNN.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a critique of CNN's criteria, which could be seen as questioning their integrity. This is a minor violation as it could lead to public distrust in media practices.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on public figures and their polling data without engaging in personal attacks or harassment.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding by providing specific poll data and a link to a detailed source, encouraging informed discussion.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism of CNN's criteria without resorting to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.By highlighting polling data and questioning CNN's criteria, the statement uses its platform to advocate for transparency and fairness in the debate qualification process, which can be seen as an effort to better society.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech by expressing a viewpoint on public polling and debate qualifications, doing so responsibly and with integrity.
[+1]