Mike Johnson

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 50

The statement criticizes President Biden's handling of border security by comparing it to the concerns expressed by an individual who crossed the border illegally. The tone is accusatory and politically charged, aiming to highlight perceived failures in border policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a derogatory term 'illegals' which can be harmful and dehumanizing, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others by using the term 'illegals,' which can be considered disrespectful and stigmatizing. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a divisive tone that could incite negative emotions. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a sweeping generalization and a personal attack on President Biden without offering a constructive solution. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it resorts to derogatory language and personal attacks. [-1]