The statement discusses the potential benefits of including a third candidate in presidential debates, suggesting it could help transcend polarized views and reduce hateful divisions. It references a broader conversation about the impact of debates and includes a link to an opinion piece by Robert Kennedy Jr. on the topic.
- The statement strives to do no harm by promoting a more inclusive and less divisive approach to political debates. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by suggesting that including a third candidate could help transcend polarized views and reduce hateful divisions. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the current state of political debates and suggesting a potential improvement without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to suggest a change that could benefit society by promoting a more inclusive and less divisive political discourse. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly by advocating for a more inclusive debate format. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.