Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image suggest that the Democratic Party is attempting to undermine third-party candidates by hiring a project manager to gather intelligence and potentially interfere with their ballot access. The tone is accusatory and implies unethical behavior by the Democratic Party. The intent appears to be to expose and criticize these actions, rallying support to counteract them.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by accusing the Democratic Party of unethical behavior without providing full context or evidence beyond the job posting. This could contribute to mistrust and division. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but could be seen as undermining the dignity of the Democratic Party by suggesting nefarious intentions without full context. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for third-party candidates by highlighting potential challenges they face, but it does so in a way that may not foster constructive dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Democratic Party but does not provide a platform for constructive dialogue or response, potentially leading to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a potential issue in the political process, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but it does so in a way that may not be entirely responsible or balanced. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.