Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 32

The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they address significant international political issues, specifically the actions of the International Criminal Court, the role of the U.S. President, and the accountability of political leaders. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to hold specific individuals accountable for their actions and policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold leaders accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for justice. However, the accusatory tone and use of the term 'genocide' without context could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it makes strong accusations and personal attacks. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses strong language to criticize and accuse. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks, particularly against the U.S. President and Netanyahu, rather than focusing solely on their policies or actions. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to advocate for a change in leadership and policy, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the approach is confrontational. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory and inflammatory nature. [-1]