Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
-5
The statement criticizes a political party for allegedly engaging in actions that contradict their proclaimed values of democracy. The tone is accusatory and suggests hypocrisy on the part of the political party. The statement is part of a broader public discourse on political ethics and the integrity of democratic processes.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could contribute to a polarized political environment. It is important to critique actions without resorting to inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to a negative portrayal of a group, which may not uphold the dignity of others involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is accusatory and does not seek to foster constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It could be seen as a personal attack on the political party rather than a critique of specific actions or policies. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight a perceived issue in the political process, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by calling out potential unethical behavior. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.