Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by Peter Doocy involves a public figure (President Biden) and touches on issues related to privacy, potential legal matters, and public interest. It appears to be a news report rather than a promotional or lighthearted statement, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but it could be seen as intrusive or sensationalist. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement potentially violates the privacy and dignity of Hallie Biden by bringing personal relationships and legal matters into the public eye without clear necessity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it seems more focused on sensationalism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a report without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use the platform responsibly by potentially sensationalizing personal matters. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.