The statement criticizes the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the White House's decision not to support sanctions against the ICC. The tone is assertive and critical, focusing on the perceived failure of the White House to protect Israelis and Americans, and the potential negative consequences of this decision.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('outrageous,' 'terrible decision') which could be seen as inflammatory. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on a public issue. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.