The statement reflects on past skepticism towards Ray Kurzweil's prediction about human-level AI by 2029 and questions whether those who doubted him are still dismissive. The tone is somewhat provocative and challenges the views of experts who were skeptical.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of experts' opinions, which might indirectly contribute to a polarized discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on questioning past skepticism rather than fostering a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not encourage constructive criticism or dialogue either. It is more rhetorical in nature.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to question past opinions, which is a legitimate use of public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.