Robert Costa

Rank 7 of 47
|
Score 142

The statement and accompanying letter from Chief Justice Roberts to Senators Durbin and Whitehouse address a public issue concerning the participation of Supreme Court Justices in meetings with legislators. The tone is formal and respectful, and the content focuses on maintaining judicial independence and the separation of powers.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by respectfully declining the meeting request and explaining the reasons based on historical practices and principles of judicial independence. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by addressing the Senators formally and providing a reasoned explanation for the decision. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clearly explaining the rationale behind the decision, which is rooted in preserving judicial independence and the separation of powers. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a detailed response to the Senators' request without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the influence of the Chief Justice's position to uphold the principles of judicial independence and separation of powers, which are fundamental to the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing a transparent and reasoned explanation for the decision. [+1]