The statement addresses a significant public issue, specifically the trial verdict of a former President, and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, suggesting a strong partisan stance.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong, divisive language that could exacerbate tensions. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of those involved by calling the charges 'ridiculous' and the witness a 'disbarred, convicted felon.' (-1 point) [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against the Democrats and the witness. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it is highly partisan and inflammatory. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.