Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a significant public issue, specifically the trial verdict of a former President, and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, suggesting a strong partisan stance.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly in its accusatory tone and the use of terms like 'shameful' and 'ridiculous.' This could exacerbate divisions and harm public discourse. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of those involved, particularly the Democrats and the witness. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it appears to deepen partisan divides. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad accusations without engaging with the specifics of the case or the opposing viewpoint. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given its highly partisan and accusatory nature. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.