The statement and linked content appear to engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of presidential candidates and promoting an alternative choice. The tone suggests a critical view of the current political options and advocates for Dr. Cornel West as a preferable candidate.
- The statement uses strong language ('disgraceful politicians') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'disgraceful' could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes an alternative candidate, which could be seen as an attempt to foster understanding and offer a different perspective, aligning with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes a blanket negative statement about the current politicians, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to promote a political candidate, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment, depending on one's perspective. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, which aligns with using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.