The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive issue related to the power and discretion of federal prosecutors, which is a significant public concern. The statement references a historical speech by Robert H. Jackson, highlighting the immense power prosecutors hold and the potential for abuse. This is a reply to a conversation about the ethical responsibilities of prosecutors, making it relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It references a historical speech to provide context and insight into the discussion about prosecutorial power. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a historical perspective on the issue of prosecutorial discretion. It encourages readers to consider the ethical implications of such power. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a request for information and providing a relevant historical reference. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing a historically significant speech that contributes to the public understanding of prosecutorial power. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.