The statement 'Right on first wrong on second' is a brief response to a conversation about presidential pardons and the legal limitations surrounding them. The tone is corrective and somewhat dismissive, aiming to clarify a legal point while also expressing skepticism about the feasibility of the suggested actions.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is focused on correcting a perceived misinformation.
ย [+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
ย [+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does aim to clarify a legal point, which can contribute to informed public discourse.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism by correcting a perceived error without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
ย [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to correct misinformation.
ย [+1]