Sandi Bachom 📹
@sandibachom
·
165d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the political landscape and public perception of Donald Trump. The tone is confrontational and suggests a divisive perspective on Trump's role and appeal.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it acknowledges and seems to accept the divisive and potentially harmful nature of Trump's appeal. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does imply a tolerance for fear and hate, which indirectly violates the principle of respecting the dignity of others. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it instead highlights division and fear. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a declaration that dismisses opposing views. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society; it seems to endorse divisiveness and fear. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it promotes a divisive and fear-based narrative. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.