The statement engages with public issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the response of public figures, and the need for policy review, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is critical and calls for a serious review of pandemic policies, while also addressing the politicization of the pandemic response.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm, but the use of the term 'China virus' could be seen as harmful and stigmatizing, which violates the principle of doing no harm with words and actions.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the term 'China virus' could be interpreted as disrespectful and potentially harmful to the dignity of others.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism and does not offer a constructive path forward.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of public figures and policies but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on policy issues.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The call for a '9/11 style review of all pandemic policies' suggests a desire to use influence for the betterment of society by advocating for thorough policy evaluation.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to address public concerns, but the use of potentially stigmatizing language detracts from responsible use of the platform.