The statement criticizes a hearing, suggesting it was biased and lacked proper oversight. It implies that the hearing favored a particular political stance without sufficient evidence, and it calls for more rigorous inquiry and proof.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but is critical of the hearing's conduct.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes the need for understanding and inquiry, which can be seen as promoting empathy and compassion for those seeking truth. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the hearing, though it could be seen as somewhat harsh, it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to call for better oversight and inquiry. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.