The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the response to COVID-19 and the conduct of a House subcommittee hearing. It calls for a constructive approach to understanding what went wrong during the pandemic response and criticizes unproductive actions, such as targeting Dr. Fauci for bad reasons. The statement also mentions a discussion with Rep. Rich McCormick and former CDC Director Robert Redfield, indicating a substantive engagement with public figures on this issue.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a constructive approach rather than unproductive attacks. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by calling for a focus on what went wrong during the COVID-19 response. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by criticizing unproductive actions and promoting dialogue with knowledgeable figures. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage a better approach to public health discussions. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly addressing a public issue and promoting integrity in the discourse. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.