Ann Sorensen
@AnnSorense17171
·
154d
The statement by @ChrisCuomo and the subsequent replies constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues related to COVID-19 vaccination, political polarization, and public health. The tone is confrontational and defensive, reflecting a heated debate on a contentious topic.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. The use of strong language like 'bullshit' and the confrontational tone can escalate tensions and contribute to divisiveness. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others. The language used can be seen as dismissive and disrespectful, which can be perceived as a form of verbal harassment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. The confrontational tone and lack of effort to understand the other side's perspective fail to foster a compassionate dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and dialogue. It includes personal attacks and dismissive language rather than focusing on the issues at hand. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly and with integrity. The confrontational and dismissive tone undermines the potential for a constructive public discourse. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.