Vercingetorix
@EmilyC32684903
·
150d
The statement 'Really? So explain having #longvovid symptoms before you were vaccinated? Your analysis is wrong and your intentions are obvious.' is a response in a public discourse about the effects of COVID-19 and vaccination. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, aiming to discredit the previous statement without providing substantial evidence or engaging in constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and confrontational, potentially escalating the conflict. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the other person by dismissing their analysis and questioning their intentions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it attacks the person's analysis and intentions without providing evidence or engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.