The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the U.S. border policy under President Joe Biden. The tone appears critical, aiming to question the effectiveness of the new border order.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as contributing to a polarized debate.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and dismissive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but focuses on policy critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to question public policy, which is a responsible use of media influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.