Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 22

The statement criticizes the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and suggests that many Democrats are in an 'abusive political relationship' with it. It calls for a change, implying that the majority of Americans are seeking something new. The tone is critical and somewhat provocative, aiming to challenge the status quo within the Democratic Party.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('abusive political relationship') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. This could potentially harm the discourse by escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of the term 'abusive' could be seen as disrespectful to those who have experienced actual abuse. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a confrontational tone that may alienate some readers. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad, sweeping criticism without providing specific examples or solutions, and it could be seen as a personal attack on the DNC and its supporters. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive. The provocative language could polarize rather than contribute to a meaningful dialogue. [-1]