Reposted by Cornel West
The statement by Cornel West constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues such as war crimes, border policies, immigration, and political polarization. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to provoke thought and discussion on these matters.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it labels multiple presidents as war criminals, which is a severe accusation. This could be seen as harmful rhetoric. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations that could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals' dignity. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of serious issues like war crimes and border policies, but the accusatory tone may hinder empathy and compassion. (+1 point)Â [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes strong accusations without offering a platform for discussion or rebuttal. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to significant societal issues, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by raising awareness. (+2 points)Â [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express strong opinions, but the responsibility and integrity of such severe accusations can be questioned. (+1 point)Â [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.