Don Lemon

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -14

The statement and the linked content constitute public discourse as they engage with substantive public issues, including the legal proceedings against Donald Trump, the implications for the election, and broader sociopolitical topics. The tone is critical and provocative, particularly in the initial tweet by Van Lathan, which could be seen as inflammatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by Van Lathan could be seen as doing harm by using a racially charged description, which may polarize rather than promote constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but it does use provocative language that could be interpreted as disrespectful. (-1 point) [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The linked podcast episode aims to promote understanding and empathy by discussing various sociopolitical issues in depth. (+1 point) [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement by Van Lathan does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a personal attack, which is not conducive to productive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly, given the inflammatory nature of the comment. (-1 point) [-1]