Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement by @RepPressley constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically addressing concerns about a political manifesto and its potential impact on U.S. agencies, policies, and civil rights.
- The statement aims to inform the public about perceived threats, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by raising awareness. However, the language used is strong and could incite fear or panic, which might be considered harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on critiquing a political manifesto rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on warning and alerting the public about potential dangers.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the content of the manifesto rather than individuals associated with it. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of a public figure to raise awareness about a political issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by informing the public. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue, though the strong language could be seen as lacking in nuance.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.