Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically immigration and border security, and critiques the impact of a recent executive order by President Biden. The tone is urgent and critical, suggesting that the executive order has not had the intended effect on border security. The accompanying images aim to provide visual evidence of the claim.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could contribute to a broader narrative that may stigmatize immigrants. This could be seen as a minor violation of the principle to do no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of the individuals in the images as no personal information is disclosed. However, the use of images of people in a vulnerable situation without their consent could be seen as a minor violation of their dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards the individuals crossing the border. Instead, it focuses on the perceived failure of the executive order, which could be seen as a significant violation of this principle.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the executive order but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of public concern, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the framing of the issue could be more balanced to fully adhere to this principle.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on a public policy issue. It does so responsibly, though the tone could be more balanced to ensure integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.