Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47

Score 29

-1

Every single one of these outlets cited the same sole source, Hamilton 68. The point of the story is that Twitter told members of congress and journalists that the dashboard was bullshit — literally, “bullshit.” And everyone kept pushing it anyway.

Richard Dodge 🎯

@Hooplogic

615d

@mtaibbi Mistaken and lying aren’t always the same thing just FYI … you always spin stuff to the worst possible place … every single time. And yes Russia most certainly boost dissent including walkaway

6/6/2024, 11:43:49 PM

The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the integrity of media reporting and the potential misuse of information to influence public opinion. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that media outlets and certain individuals knowingly propagated false information. The statement raises concerns about media ethics, accountability, and the impact of misinformation on public discourse.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to expose what it perceives as harmful actions by media outlets, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone could potentially harm the reputations of those involved, which might be seen as a violation.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy of individuals by not naming specific journalists or members of Congress, but it does accuse them of knowingly spreading false information, which could be seen as a form of harassment or cyberbullying. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the potential misuse of information and its impact on public discourse. However, the accusatory tone may undermine this effort.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of media outlets and individuals. However, the use of strong language like 'bullshit' and the accusatory tone could be seen as personal attacks, which violates this principle. [-1]
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on criticizing others.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about potential misinformation and media ethics, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]