Schlemiellionaire
@ShalremainThaGo
·
614d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the actions and consequences of individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol events, comparing them to other forms of protest and questioning the severity of the penalties imposed. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived inconsistencies in the treatment of different types of protestors.
- The statement does not directly promote harm but could be seen as downplaying the seriousness of the actions on January 6th, which might indirectly cause harm by minimizing the impact of such events. This results in a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals involved but could be seen as dismissive of the dignity of those affected by the January 6th events, including law enforcement and lawmakers. This results in a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those affected by the January 6th events, focusing instead on defending the actions of one individual. This results in a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the penalties imposed on January 6th participants but does so in a way that could be interpreted as a personal attack on those who view the events as serious. This results in a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.